Beyond the Slogan: Securitization, Political Division, and Scholarly Refinement in Taiwan’s Ukraine Response
- Frank Wong

- 6 days ago
- 1 min read
Following the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022, the slogan “Today
Ukraine, Tomorrow Taiwan” gained global prominence, often framing crossstrait
relations through a pessimistic, military-centric lens. However, this discourse
frequently overlooks internal Taiwanese perspectives, particularly regarding nonmilitary
dimensions. This article addresses this gap through a systematic review of
Chinese-language peer-reviewed works authored by Taiwanese scholars between
2022 and 2025. The findings indicate that Taiwanese experts largely reject both
a direct Ukraine analogy and a military-centric approach, instead deriving multifaceted
lessons that encompass geopolitical, diplomatic, economic, and domestic
political strategies. Utilizing Securitization Theory, this study analyzes Taiwan’s
internal political fracture: while the ruling Democratic Progressive Party securitizes
the conflict to justify military reforms and protect a distinctive Taiwanese identity,
the opposition Kuomintang employs a desecuritizing narrative to advocate for
dialogue with China as a path toward peace and prosperity. Crucially, this study
highlights how scholarly discourse acts as a refinement mechanism in the securitization
process. Scholars do not merely legitimize government policies with analytical
substance; they also leverage their analytical expertise to resecuritize specific
strategic threats, thereby justifying the implementation of calibrated extraordinary
measures. Ultimately, the article argues that Taiwan’s post-Ukraine strategy will
emphasize policy continuity, suggesting the cross-strait status quo is likely to persist
in the short to medium term. By foregrounding these insider perspectives, this
study provides a necessary corrective to Western-centric assessments of East Asian
security. Furthermore, it offers a significant theoretical contribution by identifying
a functional division of labor between the government and scholars within the securitization
process.



Comments